

Let’s just say I am for it.
While it’s true that the standard for the CrossFit kettlebell swing is the overhead, often referred to as the “American Swing”, there is room for application of the neck level, “Russian Swing”.
What’s even more important is not that the RKC endorses the neck level swing, it’s the approach to strength training. The RKC is a school of strength and it’s not necessarily about the kettlebell. It just happens to be the tool of choice. Several RKC’s have backgrounds and expertise in areas such as Olympic Lifting (Geoff Neupert), Track and Field (Dan John), strongman events (Jedd Johnson, David Whitley), among others.
The idea that it’s only swings and getup is mistaken.
How can CrossFit benefit from the RKC?
How can the RKC benefit from CrossFit?
What’s missing from CrossFit that the RKC has? Well I am sure there are people that will fill me in on that. I’ll say that the concept of teaching tension hasn’t been discussed in enough detail in the Level One Seminars (I’ve been through two now).
What’s missing from the RKC that CrossFit has? This is much harder to answer. I’m not going to say I wish the RKC would use medicine ball cleans… (that was a little joke). The RKC has the concept of intensity. It has strength covered. Even endurance and VO2 max conditioning are there. Body weight training and mobility work is there too.
From a program perspective both groups seek to do the simple things well. Virtuosity right? Do the common, uncommonly well. Movement.
The biggest difference is in the execution of the training. There are RKC’s that are less inclined to focus on movement and more about entertaining (fortunately I haven’t personally met one yet). There are CrossFit trainers that are more about doing Clean and Jerks than executing constantly varied, high intensity, functional movement. It happens.
With CrossFit, there is a trust that the system will right itself. The thought is that bad trainers will simply cease to train, and if they injure someone, the customer (or the legal system) will take the trainer out of circulation.
The RKC takes it more personally. If you pass the RKC, you are representing the entire organization. If you injure someone, it’s reflected not just on you, but on your methods, your approach to training and the RKC system.
Passing the RKC is much more difficult than passing the CrossFit Level One Trainer course. Although I have to admit the exam that the Level one trainers have to pass is NOT easy. I didn’t pass it the first time and decided that taking the Level One Course again after two years couldn’t hurt. It was a good experience and I encourage more CF trainers to do the same. It’s always a good jolt to the system! I passed the exam on the second try
Here’s where I think a more combined approach of using RKC and CrossFit methods would be most beneficial:
- Train your body for success – don’t teach it to go to failure (unless you’re competing, and then all bets are off
)
- Learn to use your hips – the kettlebell swing, once mastered will teach you that and you can apply it to other movements
- Learn tension – strength lifts will go up, bodyweight training (pistols, handstand pushups) will get easier…
The RKC is not a system that will likely integrate CrossFit methodology into its training core, rather, it’s a school of thought that can easily be absorbed by CrossFit as an approach to reach a wider athlete base.
Perhaps that’s the beauty of CrossFit is that it’s structured to learn and absorb from a wide variety of sources. It may not become an RKC kind of organization, but it will learn from it.